Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Register
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
O
OpenLDAP
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Requirements
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Locked files
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Test cases
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package registry
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Code review analytics
Issue analytics
Insights
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
David Barchiesi
OpenLDAP
Commits
abb70f70
Commit
abb70f70
authored
14 years ago
by
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
ITS#6866
parent
1d903ac3
No related branches found
No related tags found
Tags containing commit
No related merge requests found
Changes
2
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
CHANGES
+1
-0
1 addition, 0 deletions
CHANGES
doc/guide/admin/replication.sdf
+3
-3
3 additions, 3 deletions
doc/guide/admin/replication.sdf
with
4 additions
and
3 deletions
CHANGES
+
1
−
0
View file @
abb70f70
...
...
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ OpenLDAP 2.4.25 Engineering
Documentation
admin24 guide ldapi usage (ITS#6839)
admin24 guide conversion notes (ITS#6834)
admin24 guide fix drawback math for syncrepl (ITS#6866)
admin24 guide note manpages are definitive (ITS#6855)
OpenLDAP 2.4.24 Release (2011/02/10)
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
doc/guide/admin/replication.sdf
+
3
−
3
View file @
abb70f70
...
...
@@ -317,11 +317,11 @@ only the final state of the entry is significant. But this approach
may have drawbacks when the usage pattern involves single changes to
multiple objects.
For example, suppose you have a database consisting of 10
0,0
00 objects of 1 KB
For example, suppose you have a database consisting of 10
2,4
00 objects of 1 KB
each. Further, suppose you routinely run a batch job to change the value of
a single two-byte attribute value that appears in each of the 10
0,0
00 objects
a single two-byte attribute value that appears in each of the 10
2,4
00 objects
on the master. Not counting LDAP and TCP/IP protocol overhead, each time you
run this job each consumer will transfer and process {{B:1
G
B}} of data to
run this job each consumer will transfer and process {{B:1
00 M
B}} of data to
process {{B:200KB of changes!}}
99.98% of the data that is transmitted and processed in a case like this will
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment