Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit abb70f70 authored by Quanah Gibson-Mount's avatar Quanah Gibson-Mount
Browse files

ITS#6866

parent 1d903ac3
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ OpenLDAP 2.4.25 Engineering
Documentation
admin24 guide ldapi usage (ITS#6839)
admin24 guide conversion notes (ITS#6834)
admin24 guide fix drawback math for syncrepl (ITS#6866)
admin24 guide note manpages are definitive (ITS#6855)
OpenLDAP 2.4.24 Release (2011/02/10)
......
......@@ -317,11 +317,11 @@ only the final state of the entry is significant. But this approach
may have drawbacks when the usage pattern involves single changes to
multiple objects.
For example, suppose you have a database consisting of 100,000 objects of 1 KB
For example, suppose you have a database consisting of 102,400 objects of 1 KB
each. Further, suppose you routinely run a batch job to change the value of
a single two-byte attribute value that appears in each of the 100,000 objects
a single two-byte attribute value that appears in each of the 102,400 objects
on the master. Not counting LDAP and TCP/IP protocol overhead, each time you
run this job each consumer will transfer and process {{B:1 GB}} of data to
run this job each consumer will transfer and process {{B:100 MB}} of data to
process {{B:200KB of changes!}}
99.98% of the data that is transmitted and processed in a case like this will
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment