- Oct 28, 2006
-
-
Howard Chu authored
-
Kurt Zeilenga authored
-
Kurt Zeilenga authored
-
Kurt Zeilenga authored
a server is unwilling to make use of a known critical control.
-
Kurt Zeilenga authored
-
- Oct 27, 2006
-
-
Kurt Zeilenga authored
Remove unnecessary ISOC notices
-
- Oct 26, 2006
-
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Howard Chu authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Howard Chu authored
-
- Oct 24, 2006
-
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
- Oct 22, 2006
-
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
- Oct 21, 2006
-
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Kurt Zeilenga authored
-
- Oct 20, 2006
-
-
Kurt Zeilenga authored
-
- Oct 18, 2006
-
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
- Oct 17, 2006
-
-
Howard Chu authored
-
Howard Chu authored
-
Howard Chu authored
from another thread. Drop the assert, just return instead.
-
- Oct 15, 2006
-
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
- Oct 14, 2006
-
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
only abort update if failed pre/post read control is critical: the only thing RFC 4527 says about failure is that in case of failure of the read, no control is appended to the result message; maybe no failure should ever occur (please review)
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
- Oct 11, 2006
-
-
Kurt Zeilenga authored
-
- Oct 10, 2006
-
-
Ralf Haferkamp authored
-
- Oct 09, 2006
-
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-