Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit ec4e7ef2 authored by Kurt Zeilenga's avatar Kurt Zeilenga
Browse files

Add note that some of the unimplemented matching rules are

now described in RFC 3698.  Would be good to implement these.
parent d3de8c33
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -2889,21 +2889,23 @@ char *objectIdentifierFirstComponentMatchSyntaxes[] = {
/*
* Other matching rules in X.520 that we do not use (yet):
*
* 2.5.13.9 numericStringOrderingMatch
* 2.5.13.9* numericStringOrderingMatch
* 2.5.13.25 uTCTimeMatch
* 2.5.13.26 uTCTimeOrderingMatch
* 2.5.13.31 directoryStringFirstComponentMatch
* 2.5.13.32 wordMatch
* 2.5.13.33 keywordMatch
* 2.5.13.31* directoryStringFirstComponentMatch
* 2.5.13.32* wordMatch
* 2.5.13.33* keywordMatch
* 2.5.13.36 certificatePairExactMatch
* 2.5.13.37 certificatePairMatch
* 2.5.13.38 certificateListExactMatch
* 2.5.13.39 certificateListMatch
* 2.5.13.40 algorithmIdentifierMatch
* 2.5.13.41 storedPrefixMatch
* 2.5.13.41* storedPrefixMatch
* 2.5.13.42 attributeCertificateMatch
* 2.5.13.43 readerAndKeyIDMatch
* 2.5.13.44 attributeIntegrityMatch
*
* (*) described in RFC 3698 (LDAP: Additional Matching Rules)
*/
static slap_mrule_defs_rec mrule_defs[] = {
/*
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment