- Oct 14, 2006
-
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
only abort update if failed pre/post read control is critical: the only thing RFC 4527 says about failure is that in case of failure of the read, no control is appended to the result message; maybe no failure should ever occur (please review)
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
- Oct 11, 2006
-
-
Kurt Zeilenga authored
-
- Oct 10, 2006
-
-
Ralf Haferkamp authored
-
- Oct 09, 2006
-
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
- Oct 08, 2006
-
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Howard Chu authored
-
Howard Chu authored
-
Howard Chu authored
-
- Oct 07, 2006
-
-
Howard Chu authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
- Oct 06, 2006
-
-
Howard Chu authored
-
Quanah Gibson-Mount authored
-
Howard Chu authored
-
Howard Chu authored
-
- Oct 05, 2006
-
-
Howard Chu authored
-
- Oct 03, 2006
-
-
Kurt Zeilenga authored
ITS#4693.
-
Howard Chu authored
-
- Sep 30, 2006
-
-
Kurt Zeilenga authored
-
Kurt Zeilenga authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
- Sep 27, 2006
-
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Ralf Haferkamp authored
-
- Sep 26, 2006
-
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
don't know exactly the reason, but here without this back-hdb suddenly starts crashings all times (since bdb_monitor_* stuff)
-
Pierangelo Masarati authored
-