Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
rfc2926.txt 54.1 KiB
Newer Older
  • Learn to ignore specific revisions
  • Kurt Zeilenga's avatar
    Kurt Zeilenga committed
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Network Working Group                                           J. Kempf
    Request for Comments: 2926                        Sun Microsystems, Inc.
    Category: Informational                                         R. Moats
                                                                Coreon, Inc.
                                                               P. St. Pierre
                                                      Sun Microsystems, Inc.
                                                              September 2000
    
    
              Conversion of LDAP Schemas to and from SLP Templates
    
    Status of this Memo
    
       This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does
       not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of this
       memo is unlimited.
    
    Copyright Notice
    
       Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000).  All Rights Reserved.
    
    Abstract
    
       This document describes a procedure for mapping between Service
       Location Protocol (SLP) service advertisements and lightweight
       directory access protocol (LDAP) descriptions of services.  The
       document covers two aspects of the mapping.  One aspect is mapping
       between SLP service type templates and LDAP directory schema.
       Because the SLP service type template grammar is relatively simple,
       mapping from service type templates to LDAP types is straightforward.
       Mapping in the other direction is straightforward if the attributes
       are restricted to use just a few of the syntaxes defined in RFC 2252.
       If arbitrary ASN.1 types occur in the schema, then the mapping is
       more complex and may even be impossible.  The second aspect is
       representation of service information in an LDAP directory.  The
       recommended representation simplifies interoperability with SLP by
       allowing SLP directory agents to backend into LDAP directory servers.
       The resulting system allows service advertisements to propagate
       easily between SLP and LDAP.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Kempf, et al.                Informational                      [Page 1]
    
    RFC 2926               Conversion of LDAP Schemas         September 2000
    
    
    Table of Contents
    
       1.0 Introduction ................................................  2
       2.0 Mapping SLP Templates to LDAP Schema ........................  3
         2.1 Mapping from SLP Attribute Types to LDAP Attribute Types ..  8
           2.1.1 Integer ...............................................  8
           2.1.2 String ................................................  8
           2.1.3 Boolean ...............................................  9
           2.1.4 Opaque ................................................  9
         2.2 Keyword Attributes ........................................  9
         2.3 Template Flags ............................................  9
           2.3.1 Multi-valued ..........................................  9
           2.3.2 Optional .............................................. 10
           2.3.3 Literal ............................................... 10
           2.3.4 Explicit Matching ..................................... 10
         2.4 Default and Allowed Value Lists ........................... 10
         2.5 Descriptive Text .......................................... 11
         2.6 Generating LDAP Attribute OIDs ............................ 11
         2.7 Example ................................................... 11
       3.0 Attribute Name Conflicts .................................... 15
       4.0 Mapping from Schema to Templates ............................ 15
         4.1 Mapping LDAP Attribute Types to SLP Attribute Types ....... 16
         4.2 Mapping ASN.1 Types to SLP Types .......................... 17
           4.2.1 Integer ............................................... 18
           4.2.2 Boolean ............................................... 18
           4.2.3 Enumerated ............................................ 18
           4.2.4 Object Identifier ..................................... 19
           4.2.5 Octet String .......................................... 19
           4.2.6 Real .................................................. 19
         4.3 Example ASN.1 Schema ...................................... 19
       5.0 Representing SLP Service Advertisements in an LDAP DIT ...... 22
       6.0 Internationalization Considerations ......................... 24
       7.0 Security Considerations ..................................... 24
       8.0 References .................................................. 25
       9.0 Authors' Addresses .......................................... 26
       10.0 Full Copyright Statement ................................... 27
    
    1.0 Introduction
    
       SLP templates [1] are intended to create a simple encoding of the
       syntactic and semantic conventions for individual service types,
       their attributes, and conventions.  They can easily be generated,
       transmitted, read by humans and parsed by programs, as it is a string
       based syntax with required comments.  Directory schemas serve to
       formalize directory entry structures for use with LDAP [2] These
       directories serve to store information about many types of entities.
       Network services are an example of one such entity.
    
    
    
    
    Kempf, et al.                Informational                      [Page 2]
    
    RFC 2926               Conversion of LDAP Schemas         September 2000
    
    
       Interoperability between SLP and LDAP is important so clients using
       one protocol derive benefit from services registered through the
       other. In addition, LDAP directory servers can serve as the backend
       for SLP directory agents (DAs) if interoperability is possible In
       order to facilitate interoperability, this document creates mappings
       between the SLP template grammar and LDAP directory schema, and
       establishes some conventions for representing service advertisements
       in LDAP directories. The goal of the translation is to allow SLPv2
       queries (which are syntactically and semantically equivalent to
       LDAPv3 string queries [7]) to be submitted to an LDAP directory
       server by an SLP DA backended into LDAP without extensive processing
       by the DA.
    
       The simple notation and syntactic/semantic attribute capabilities of
       SLP templates map easily into directory schemas, and are easily
       converted into directory schemas, even by automated means.  The
       reverse may not be true. If the LDAP schema contains attributes with
       unrecognized or complex syntaxes, the translation may be difficult or
       impossible.  If, however, the LDAP schema only uses a few of the
       common syntaxes defined in RFC 2252 [8], then the translation is more
       straightforward. In addition, to foster complete bidirectionality,
       the mapping must follow a very specific representation in its DESC
       attributes.
    
       This document outlines the correct mappings for SLP templates into
       the syntactic representation specified for LDAP directory schema by
       RFC 2252 [8]. This syntax is a subset of the ASN.1/BER described in
       the X.209 specification [9], and is used by the LDAPv3 [2] directory
       schema.  Likewise, rules and guidelines are proposed to facilitate
       consistent mapping of ASN.1 based schemas to be translated in the SLP
       template grammar. Finally, a proposal for a representation of service
       advertisements in LDAP directory services is made that facilitates
       SLP interoperability.
    
       Except when used as elements in the definition of LDAP schemas, the
       key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
       "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
       document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [16].
    
    2.0 Mapping SLP Templates to LDAP Schema
    
       We define the following abstract object class as the parent class for
       all services.  Any specific service type is a subclass of this, with
       its own attributes:
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Kempf, et al.                Informational                      [Page 3]
    
    RFC 2926               Conversion of LDAP Schemas         September 2000
    
    
          ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.6252.2.27.6.2.1
            NAME 'slpService'
            DESC 'parent superclass for SLP services'
            ABSTRACT
            SUP top
            MUST  ( template-major-version-number $
                    template-minor-version-number $
                    description $
                    template-url-syntax $
                    service-advert-service-type $
                    service-advert-scopes )
            MAY   ( service-advert-url-authenticator $
                    service-advert-attribute-authenticator ) )
    
       The attributes correspond to various parts of the SLP service
       template and SLP service advertisement.
    
       SLP service type templates begin with four definitions that set the
       context of the template:
    
          template-type - This defines the service type of the template. The
          service type can be a simple service type, like "service:ftp", an
          abstract service type, like "service:printer" or a concrete
          service type, like "service:printer:lpr". The type name can
          additionally include a naming authority, for example
          "service:printer.sun:local".  The name that appears in this field
          omits the "service:" prefix.
    
          template-version - A string containing a major and minor version
          number, separated by a period.
    
          template-description - A block of human readable text describing
          what the service type does.
    
          template-url-syntax - An ABNF [6] grammar describing the service
          type specific part of the service URL.
    
       The SLP template-type definition is used as the name of the LDAP
       object class for the template, a subclass of the "slpService" class,
       together with the "service" prefix to indicate that the name is for a
       service. In the translating service type name, colons and the period
       separating the naming authority are converted into hyphens. If the
       template defines an SLP concrete type, the concrete type name is
       used; the abstract type name is never used.  For example, the
       template for "service:printer:lpr" is translated into an LDAP object
       class called "service-printer-lpr". Furthermore, if the type name
       contains a naming authority, the naming authority name must be
    
    
    
    
    Kempf, et al.                Informational                      [Page 4]
    
    RFC 2926               Conversion of LDAP Schemas         September 2000
    
    
       included. For example, the service type name
       "service:printer.sun:local" becomes "service-printer-sun-local".  The
       LDAP object class is always "STRUCTURAL".
    
       The template-version definition is partitioned into two attributes,
       template-major-version-number and template-minor-version-number. The
       LDAP definition for these attributes is:
    
          ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.6252.2.27.6.1.1
            NAME 'template-major-version-number'
            DESC 'The major version number of the service type template'
            EQUALITY integerMatch
            SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27
            SINGLE-VALUE
          )
    
          ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.6252.2.27.6.1.2
            NAME 'template-minor-version-number'
            DESC 'The minor version number of the service type template'
            EQUALITY integerMatch
            SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27
            SINGLE-VALUE
          )
    
       The template-url-syntax definition in the SLP template is described
       by the following attribute:
    
          ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.6252.2.27.6.1.3
            NAME 'template-url-syntax'
            DESC 'An ABNF grammar describing the service type
                  specific part of the service URL'
            EQUALITY caseExactIA5Match
            SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26
            SINGLE-VALUE
          )
    
       The template-description attribute is translated into the X.520
       standard attribute "description" [3].
    
       We further establish the convention that SLP template characteristics
       that can't be translated into LDAP are inserted into the DESC field
       of the object class definition. The items are separated by empty
       lines (consisting of two "LINE FEED" characters), are preceded by a
       LINE FEED character, and are tagged at the  beginning of the line to
       indicate what they represent.   This allows the template to be
       reconstructed from the schema by properly parsing the comments.
    
    
    
    
    
    Kempf, et al.                Informational                      [Page 5]
    
    RFC 2926               Conversion of LDAP Schemas         September 2000
    
    
       The bulk of an SLP template consists of attribute definitions.  There
       are four items in an SLP template attribute definition that need to
       be mapped into LDAP:
    
          Attribute Name - Since SLPv2 attribute names are defined to be
          compatible with LDAPv3, SLP attributes map directly into LDAP
          attributes with no change. Similarly, LDAP attributes map directly
          to SLP attributes.
    
          Attribute Type - The SLP attribute type is mapped into the LDAP
          attribute type.
    
          Attribute Flags - The SLP attribute flags are mapped into
          characteristics of the LDAP attribute definition, or into the DESC
          field if no equivalent LDAP attribute definition characteristic
          occurs.
    
          Default and Allowed Values - These must be handled by the client
          or a DA enabled to handle templates, as in SLP. For reference,
          however, they should be included in the DESC field of the LDAP
          attribute definition.
    
          Descriptive Text - The SLP template descriptive text should be
          mapped into the DESC field.
    
       We discuss mapping of types, flags, default and allowed values, and
       descriptive text in the subsections below.
    
       OIDs for SLP template conversion schema elements are standardized
       under the enterprise number of SrvLoc.Org (6252) [18].
    
       For purposes of representing an SLP entry, we also define two
       standardized LDAP syntaxes and attributes with standardized OIDs.
    
          ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.6252.2.27.6.2.2
            DESC 'SLP Service Type'
          )
    
       Defines the syntax for the service type name. The syntax is defined
       in the BNF for the service URL in RFC 2609 Section 2.1 [1].
    
          ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.6252.2.27.6.2.3
            DESC 'SLP Scope'
          )
    
       Defines the syntax for the scope name. The syntax is defined in the
       BNF for scope names in RFC 2608 Section 6.4.1 [5].
    
    
    
    
    Kempf, et al.                Informational                      [Page 6]
    
    RFC 2926               Conversion of LDAP Schemas         September 2000
    
    
          ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.6252.2.27.6.1.4
            NAME 'service-advert-service-type'
            DESC 'The service type of the service advertisement, including
                  the "service:" prefix.'
            EQUALITY caseExactIA5Match
            SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.6252.2.27.6.2.2
            SINGLE-VALUE
          )
    
       Defines an attribute for the service type name.
    
          ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.6252.2.27.6.1.5
            NAME 'service-advert-scopes'
            DESC 'A list of scopes for a service advertisement.'
            EQUALITY caseExactIA5Match
            SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.6252.2.27.6.2.3
          )
    
       Defines a multivalued attribute for the scopes.
    
       Searches for abstract types can be made with an LDAP query that
       wildcards the concrete type. For example, a search for all service
       advertisements of the printer abstract type can be made with the
       following query:
    
             (service-advert-service-type=service:printer:*)
    
       SLP specifies that service URLs and attribute lists can be
       accompanied by a structured authenticator consisting of a digital
       signature and information necessary to verify the signature.  A
       syntax and two standardized SLP attributes are defined for this
       purpose:
    
          ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.6252.2.27.6.2.3 DESC 'SLP Authenticator')
    
          The syntax of an SLP authenticator is the bytes of the
          authenticator in network byte order, see RFC 2608, Section 9.2
          [5].
    
          ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.6252.2.27.6.1.6
            NAME 'service-advert-url-authenticator'
            DESC 'The authenticator for the URL, null if none.'
            SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.6252.2.27.6.2.3
            SINGLE-VALUE
          )
    
          This attribute contains the SLP URL authenticator, as defined in
          RFC 2608, Section 9.2 [5].
    
    
    
    Kempf, et al.                Informational                      [Page 7]
    
    RFC 2926               Conversion of LDAP Schemas         September 2000
    
    
          ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.6252.2.27.6.1.7
            NAME 'service-advert-attribute-authenticator'
            DESC 'The authenticator for the attribute list, null if none.'
            SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.6252.2.27.6.2.3
            SINGLE_VALUE
          )
    
          This attribute contains the SLP attribute authenticator, as
          defined in RFC 2608, Section 9.2 [5].
    
    2.1 Mapping from SLP Attribute Types to LDAP Attribute Types
    
       We define the mapping from SLP attribute types to LDAP as follows:
    
          SLP Type    ASN.1 Type               LDAP Type
          ---------------------------------------------------
           Integer     INTEGER              INTEGER
           String      DirectoryString      Directory String
           Boolean     BOOLEAN              Boolean
           Opaque      OCTET STRING         Octet String
           Keyword     (N/A)                IA5 String
    
       The following subsections discuss further details of the mapping.
    
    2.1.1 Integer
    
       SLP integers compare as integers when performing a query.  LDAP
       integers behave similarly.  Consequently, the mapping from the SLP
       integer type to LDAP is INTEGER, with the integerMatch matching rule.
    
    2.1.2 String
    
       SLP strings are encoded as described in the SLP protocol
       specification [5].  All value strings are considered case insensitive
       for matching operations.  SLP strings are not null terminated and are
       encoded in UTF-8.
    
       SLP strings are mapped to the LDAP Directory String type. The
       Directory String type exactly matches the SLP string type, i.e. it is
       a non-null terminated UTF-8 string. The caseIgnoreMatch equality
       rule, caseIgnoreOrderingMatch ordering rule, and
       caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch substring rule are used for comparing
       string attribute values.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Kempf, et al.                Informational                      [Page 8]
    
    RFC 2926               Conversion of LDAP Schemas         September 2000
    
    
    2.1.3 Boolean
    
       Boolean attributes may have one of two possible values.  In SLP,
       these values are represented as strings, TRUE and FALSE.  In SLP's
       string encoding of a boolean value, case does not matter.
    
       The SLP Boolean type maps directly into an LDAP BOOLEAN. The
       caseIgnoreMatch rule is used for equality matching.
    
    2.1.4 Opaque
    
       SLP attribute values of type Opaque are represented as OCTET STRING
       in LDAP, and the octetStringMatch matching rule is used to compare
       them.
    
    2.2 Keyword Attributes
    
       SLP service type templates allow the definition of keyword
       attributes.  Keyword attributes are attributes whose only
       characteristic is their presence. Keyword attributes have no flag
       information, nor any default or allowed values (since, by definition,
       they have no values).
    
       ASN.1 has no concept of keyword attributes. Keyword attributes are
       translated into a "May" clause in the ASN.1 class definition for the
       service type. If the keyword attribute is present, then its value is
       of no consequence, but for consistency we make it simply the NUL
       character, "\00".
    
    2.3 Template Flags
    
       SLP template flags can be handled as described in the following
       subsections.
    
    2.3.1 Multi-valued
    
       Multi-valued attributes are defined in an SLP template using the one
       value.  All values for a given attribute must be of the same type.
    
       LDAP attribute definitions require that a single valued attribute
       include the SINGLE-VALUE tag if the attribute is single valued.
       Otherwise, the attribute is assumed to be multivalued by default.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Kempf, et al.                Informational                      [Page 9]
    
    RFC 2926               Conversion of LDAP Schemas         September 2000
    
    
    2.3.2 Optional
    
       SLP uses the 'O' flag to indicate an attribute may or may not be
       present.  These optional attributes are defined using the "May"
       clause in the ASN.1 definition class definition for the service type.
       All other attributes must be defined as a "Must".
    
    2.3.3 Literal
    
       ASN.1 does not have a mechanism to indicate that the values of an
       attribute may not be translated from one language to another, since
       ASN.1 schema are not typically translated. This flag is dropped when
       translating a template, but presence of the flag should be noted in
       the DESC field. It should be placed on a separate line and tagged
       with "Literal:" so the template can be reconstructed from the schema.
    
    2.3.4 Explicit Matching
    
       The SLP template syntax uses a flag of 'X' to indicate that an
       attribute must be present in order for the query to be properly
       satisfied.  There is no provision for requiring that particular
       attributes be in a query. Consequently, this flag is dropped when
       translating a template, but presence of the flag should be noted in
       the DESC field. It should be placed on a separate line and tagged
       with "Explicit:" so the template can be reconstructed from the
       schema.
    
    2.4 Default and Allowed Value Lists
    
       The SLP template grammar provides the capability to define default
       and allowed values for an attribute. The SLP protocol does not
       enforce these restrictions on registered attributes, however.  The
       default and allowed values may be used by client side applications,
       or alternatively it may also be used by DAs to initialize
       registrations having no attributes and to limit attribute values to
       the template allowed values.
    
       LDAP servers also do not support default and allowed values on
       attributes. Therefore, enforcement of default and allowed values in
       SLP templates is left up to the clients or a DA, if the DA is
       backending into LDAP. The default and allowed values should be
       included in the DESC field. The comments should be placed on separate
       lines and labeled with the "Default:" and "Allowed:" tags to allow
       reconstruction of the template.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Kempf, et al.                Informational                     [Page 10]
    
    RFC 2926               Conversion of LDAP Schemas         September 2000
    
    
    2.5 Descriptive Text
    
       The descriptive text associated with an attribute definition should
       be included in the DESC field. It should start on a separate line and
       begin with the "Description:" tag.
    
    2.6 Generating LDAP Attribute OIDs
    
       LDAP attributes require an OID. In general, there is no a priori way
       that an algorithm can be defined for generating OIDs, because it will
       depend on the conventions used by the organization developing the
       template. In some cases, an organization's procedure for generating
       OIDs may be regular enough that a template developer can
       algorithmically generate OIDs off of an assigned root. Whatever means
       is used, the template developer should assure that unique OIDs are
       assigned to each SLP attribute that is translated into an LDAP
       attribute.
    
    2.7 Example
    
       The template included below is a hypothetical abstract printer
       service template, similar to that described in [10].
    
          template-type = printer
    
          template-version = 0.0
    
          template-description =
          The printer service template describes the attributes supported by
          network printing devices.  Devices may be either directly
          connected to a network, or connected to a printer spooler that
          understands the a network queuing protocol such as IPP, lpr or the
          Salutation  Architecture.
    
          template-url-syntax =
          ;The URL syntax is specific to the printing protocol being
          ;employed
    
          description = STRING
          # This attribute is a free form string that can contain any
          # site-specific descriptive information about this printer.
    
          printer-security-mechanisms-supported = STRING L M
          none
          # This attribute indicates the security mechanisms supported
          tls, ssl, http-basic, http-digest, none
    
    
    
    
    
    Kempf, et al.                Informational                     [Page 11]
    
    RFC 2926               Conversion of LDAP Schemas         September 2000
    
    
          printer-operator = STRING O L M
          # A person, or persons responsible for maintaining a
          # printer on a day-to-day basis, including such tasks
          # as filling empty media trays, emptying full output
          # trays, replacing toner cartridges, clearing simple
          # paper jams, etc.
    
          printer-location-address = STRING O
          # Physical/Postal address for this device.  Useful for
          # nailing down a group of printers in a very large corporate
          # network.  For example: 960 Main Street, San Jose, CA 95130
    
          printer-priority-queue = BOOLEAN O
          FALSE
          # TRUE indicates this printer or print queue is a priority
          # queuing device.
    
          printer-number-up = INTEGER O
          1
          # This job attribute specifies the number of source
          # page-images to impose upon a single side of an instance
          # of a selected medium.
          1, 2, 4
    
          printer-paper-output = STRING M L O
          standard
          # This attribute describes the mode in which pages output
          # are arranged.
    
          standard, noncollated sort, collated sort, stack, unknown
    
       We assume that the concrete type "service:printer:lpr" for printers
       that speak the LPR protocol [4] has the following template
       definition:
    
          template-type = printer:lpr
    
          template-version = 0.0
    
          template-description =
          The printer:lpr service template describes the attributes
          supported by network printing devices that speak the
          LPR protocol. No new attributes are included.
    
          template-url-syntax = queue
          queue = ;The queue name, see RFC 1179.
    
    
    
    
    
    Kempf, et al.                Informational                     [Page 12]
    
    RFC 2926               Conversion of LDAP Schemas         September 2000
    
    
       The LDAP class definition for the "service:printer:lpr" concrete
       service type is translated as follows:
    
       ( ---place the assigned OID here---
         NAME  'service-printer-lpr'
         DESC  'Description: The printer:lpr service template
                     describes the attributes supported by network printing
                     devices that speak the LPR protocol. No new attributes
                     are included.
    
                URL Syntax: queue
                     queue = ;The queue name, see RFC 1179.'
         SUP   slpService
         MUST  ( description $ security-mechanisms-supported $
         labeledURI)
         MAY   ( operator $ location-address $ priority-queue $
                 number-up $ paper-output)
       )
    
       The attribute definitions are translated as follows:
    
       ( ---place the assigned OID here---
         NAME 'printer-security-mechanisms-supported'
         DESC 'Description: This attribute indicates the security mechanisms
               supported.
    
               Default: value
    
               Allowed: tls, ssl, http-basic, http-digest, none
    
               Literal:'
         EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch
         ORDERING caseIgnoreOrderingMatch
         SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch
         SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15
       )
    
       ( ---place the assigned OID here---
         NAME 'printer-operator'
         DESC 'Description: A person, or persons responsible for
               maintaining a printer on a day-to-day basis, including
               such tasks as filling empty media trays, emptying full
               output trays, replacing toner cartridges, clearing simple
               paper jams, etc.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Kempf, et al.                Informational                     [Page 13]
    
    RFC 2926               Conversion of LDAP Schemas         September 2000
    
    
               Literal:'
         EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch
         ORDERING caseIgnoreOrderingMatch
         SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch
         SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15
       )
    
       ( --place the assigned OID here---
         NAME 'printer-location-address'
         DESC 'Description Physical/Postal address for this device.
               Useful for nailing down a group of printers in a very
               large corporate network.  For example: 960 Main Street,
               San Jose, CA 95130.'
         EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch
         ORDERING caseIgnoreOrderingMatch
         SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch
         SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15
         SINGLE-VALUE
       )
    
       ( ---place the assigned OID here---
         NAME 'printer-priority-queue'
         DESC 'Description: TRUE indicates this printer or print
              queue is a priority queuing device.'
         EQUALITY booleanMatch
         SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.7
         SINGLE-VALUE
       )
    
       ( ---place the assigned OID here---
         NAME 'printer-number-up'
         DESC 'Description: This job attribute specifies the number
               of source page-images to impose upon a single side of
               an instance of a selected medium. This attribute is
               INTEGER.
    
               Default: 1
    
               Allowed: 1, 2, 3, 4'
         EQUALITY integerMatch
         SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27
         SINGLE-VALUE
       )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Kempf, et al.                Informational                     [Page 14]
    
    RFC 2926               Conversion of LDAP Schemas         September 2000
    
    
       ( ---place the assigned OID here---
         NAME 'printer-paper-output'
         DESC 'Description: This attribute describes the mode in
               which pages output are arranged. Default value is
               standard.
    
               Default: standard
    
               Allowed: standard, noncollated sort, collated sort,
                 stack, unknown.
               Literal:'
         EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch
         ORDERING caseIgnoreOrderingMatch
         SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch
         SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15
       )
    
    3.0 Attribute Name Conflicts
    
       LDAP has a flat name space, and attribute names and OIDs must be
       unique in a directory server. In order to avoid name conflicts in the
       translation of SLP templates to LDAP schemas, template developers may
       want to consider prepending the name of the service type to the
       attribute. Postprocessing attribute names to make them unique when
       translated is not possible, because it would require the DA to
       rewrite queries before submitting them to the directory server. In
       addition, developers should use standard LDAP attributes when such
       attributes are available.
    
       In the above example template, the abstract type name "printer" is
       prepended to attributes to avoid conflicts. The standard
       "description" attribute defined by X.520 [3] is used to translate the
       template description attribute.
    
    4.0 Mapping from Schema to Templates
    
       The reverse mapping from LDAP schema to SLP service type templates
       requires dealing with both LDAP and ASN.1 data types.  RFC 2252
       defines 33 attribute syntaxes that should be supported by LDAP
       directory servers.  These syntaxes are defined using BNF for strings
       or using ASN.1 for binary  valued attributes defined by X.520.
    
       Mapping of the LDAP data types into SLP template types is fairly
       straightforward, but mapping arbitrary ASN.1 data types is somewhat
       more complicated and requires encoding the ASN.1 data type into a
       string. To a certain extent, this masks the ASN.1 data type because
       it becomes impossible to distinguish between a native string having
    
    
    
    
    Kempf, et al.                Informational                     [Page 15]
    
    RFC 2926               Conversion of LDAP Schemas         September 2000
    
    
       content equivalent to an encoded ASN.1 string. However, inclusion of
       the ASN.1 data type in the comment provides additional information
       should a reverse transformation from SLP to ASN.1 be required.
    
       The following subsections deal with both LDAP and ASN.1 attribute
       data type mappings.
    
    4.1 Mapping LDAP Attribute Syntaxes to SLP Attribute Types
    
       The following table contains the mappings for LDAP syntaxes to SLP
       data types:
    
             LDAP Type                              SLP Type
          --------------------------------------------------------
             ACI Item                                 NA
             Access Point                             NA
             Attribute Type Description               NA
             Audio                                    Opaque
             Binary                                   ASN.1 escape
             Bit String                               String
             Boolean                                  Boolean
             Certificate                              Opaque
             Certificate List                         Opaque
             Certificate Pair                         Opaque
             Country String                           String
             DN                                       String
             Data Quality Syntax                      NA
             Delivery Method                          NA
             Directory String                         String
             DIT Content Rule Description             NA
             DIT Structure Rule Description           NA
             DL Submit Permission                     NA
             DSA Quality Syntax                       NA
             Enhanced Guide                           NA
             Facsimile Telephone Number               String
             Fax                                      Opaque
             Generalized Time                         String
             Guide                                    NA
             IA5 String                               String
             INTEGER                                  Integer
             JPEG                                     Opaque
             LDAP Syntax Description                  NA
             LDAP Schema Definition                   NA
             LDAP Schema Description                  NA
             Master and Shadow Access Points          NA
             Matching Rule Description                NA
             Matching Rule Use Description            NA
             Mail Preference                          NA
    
    
    
    Kempf, et al.                Informational                     [Page 16]
    
    RFC 2926               Conversion of LDAP Schemas         September 2000
    
    
             MHS OR Address                           String
             Modify Rights                            NA
             Name and Optional UID                    NA
             Name Form Description                    NA
             Numeric String                           String
             Object Class Description                 NA
             Octet String                             Opaque
             OID                                      String
             Other Mailbox                            String
             Postal Address                           String
             Protocol Information                     NA
             Presentation Address                     String
             Printable String                         String
             Substring Assertion                      NA
             Subtree Specification                    NA
             Supplier Information                     NA
             Supplier or Consumer                     NA
             Supplier And Consumer                    NA
             Supported Algorithm                      NA
             DSE Type                                 NA
             Telephone Number                         String
             Teletex Terminal Identifier              String
             Telex Number                             String
             UTC Time                                 String
    
    4.2 Mapping ASN.1 Types to SLP Types
    
       ASN.1 employs a much richer set of data types than provided by SLP.
       The table below show the mapping of selected ASN.1 data type to their
       nearest SLP equivalent.  Because of the complexity and flexibility of
       ASN.1, a complete list cannot be provided.
    
       As sample of some ASN.1 encodings and their mappings to SLP:
    
          ASN.1 type               SLP type
          -----------------------------------------
          INTEGER                  Integer
          BOOLEAN                  Boolean
          ENUMERATED               String
          OBJECT IDENTIFIER        String
          OCTET STRING             Opaque
          REAL                     String
    
       Data types that do not map directly to SLP data types should be
       defined as either a String, or as Opaque.  ASN.1 types that may only
       contain valid characters for Strings, as defined in X.680 [9] should
       be encoded as strings.  ASN.1 types such as GraphicString that change
       their character set encoding in part way through a value should not
    
    
    
    Kempf, et al.                Informational                     [Page 17]
    
    RFC 2926               Conversion of LDAP Schemas         September 2000
    
    
       be encoded as strings, however, If such types are required, the SLP
       Opaque type should be used. In either case, the first line of the
       help text is used to indicate the original ASN.1 data type.
    
       The following subsections describe how to convert from the ASN.1 BER
       [9] to the SLP template for the different types in the table above.
    
    4.2.1 Integer
    
       Both SLP templates and ASN.1 support Integers, so there is a one to
       one mapping between an SLP Integer attribute and an ASN.1 Integer
       attribute.  Details on the encoding of integers is summarized in the
       SLP template to ASN.1 section above.
    
    4.2.2 Boolean
    
       Boolean values are supported by both SLP and ASN.1, though on wire
       encodings differ.  X.680 [9] specifies zero and non-zero encoding for
       booleans, where SLP encodes booleans using the strings TRUE and
       FALSE.  In general, most LDAP servers will use the LDAP Boolean type
       (which is a string), so again the ASN.1 type should be recorded in
       the comment or it will be lost.
    
    4.2.3 Enumerated
    
       SLP templates support the concept of enumerations through the listing
       of allowed values in the attribute definition.  These enumerations
       are not strictly binding on clients or DAs, but they are similar to
       the ASN.1 definition of enumerations. BER encodes the ASN.1
       enumeration by passing the number of the element's position in the
       enumeration.  This requires both sides to have knowledge of the
       specific enumeration prior to decoding an enumeration's value. SLP
       provides no specific support for transmitting enumerations. They are
       simply String types. Information on the ASN.1 type and ASN.1 encoding
       of the enumeration values is recorded in the comment.
    
       Example:
    
       color-supported = STRING   M
       none
       # ASN.1: Enumeration.
       # ASN.1 Mapping: none = 0, highlight = 1, three color = 2,