Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Register
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
O
OpenLDAP
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Requirements
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Locked files
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Test cases
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package registry
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Code review analytics
Issue analytics
Insights
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
James Lowden
OpenLDAP
Commits
278eadd9
Commit
278eadd9
authored
4 years ago
by
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
More for ITS#9275 and term cleanup
parent
ad85956d
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
Tags containing commit
No related merge requests found
Changes
3
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
3 changed files
doc/guide/admin/appendix-changes.sdf
+3
-4
3 additions, 4 deletions
doc/guide/admin/appendix-changes.sdf
doc/guide/admin/intro.sdf
+4
-1
4 additions, 1 deletion
doc/guide/admin/intro.sdf
doc/guide/admin/replication.sdf
+9
-8
9 additions, 8 deletions
doc/guide/admin/replication.sdf
with
16 additions
and
13 deletions
doc/guide/admin/appendix-changes.sdf
+
3
−
4
View file @
278eadd9
...
...
@@ -79,17 +79,16 @@ of the database may in turn be provided to other consumers using the Syncprov
overlay. The Syncprov overlay works with any number of consumers over a single
database or over arbitrarily many glued databases.
H3: N-Way Multi
mast
er Replication
H3: N-Way Multi
provid
er Replication
As a consequence of the work to support multiple consumer contexts, the syncrepl
system now supports full N-Way multi
mast
er replication with entry-level conflict
system now supports full N-Way multi
provid
er replication with entry-level conflict
resolution. There are some important constraints, of course: In order to maintain
consistent results across all servers, you must maintain tightly synchronized
clocks across all participating servers (e.g., you must use NTP on all servers).
The entryCSNs used for replication now record timestamps with microsecond resolution,
instead of just seconds. The delta-syncrepl code has not been updated to support
multimaster usage yet, that will come later in the 2.4 cycle.
instead of just seconds.
H3: Replicating {{slapd}} Configuration (syncrepl and {{B:cn=config}})
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
doc/guide/admin/intro.sdf
+
4
−
1
View file @
278eadd9
...
...
@@ -441,7 +441,10 @@ replication scheme is vital in high-volume environments where a
single {{slapd}} installation just doesn't provide the necessary availability
or reliability. For extremely demanding environments where a
single point of failure is not acceptable, {{multi-provider}} replication
is also available. {{slapd}} includes support for {{LDAP Sync}}-based
is also available. With {{multi-provider}} replication two or more nodes can
accept write operations allowing for redundancy at the provider level.
{{slapd}} includes support for {{LDAP Sync}}-based
replication.
{{B:Proxy Cache}}: {{slapd}} can be configured as a caching
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
doc/guide/admin/replication.sdf
+
9
−
8
View file @
278eadd9
...
...
@@ -13,16 +13,17 @@ a {{master}} server and some number of {{slave}} servers. A master
accepted directory updates from other clients, and a slave only
accepted updates from a (single) master. The replication structure
was rigidly defined and any particular database could only fulfill
a single role, either master or slave.
a single role, either master or slave. Another historic term introduced
with OpenLDAP 2.4 was multimaster.
As OpenLDAP now supports a wide variety of replication topologies, these
terms have been deprecated in favor of {{provider}} and
{{consumer}}: A provider
replicates directory updates to consumers;
consumers receive
replication updates from
providers. Unlike the
rigidly defined master/slave relationships,
provider/consumer roles
are quite fluid: replication updates received in a
consumer can be
further propagated by that consumer to other servers, so a
consumer
can also act simultaneously as a provider. Also, a consumer need not
terms have been deprecated in favor of {{provider}}
/{{multi-provider}}
and
{{consumer}}: A provider
can accept external write operations and make them
available for retrieval by consumers; consumers request
replication updates from
providers. Unlike the
rigidly defined master/slave relationships,
provider/consumer roles
are quite fluid: replication updates received in a
consumer can be
further propagated by that consumer to other servers, so a
consumer
can also act simultaneously as a provider. Also, a consumer need not
be an actual LDAP server; it may be just an LDAP client.
The following sections will describe the replication technology and
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment