Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 9f311e2b authored by Pierangelo Masarati's avatar Pierangelo Masarati
Browse files

clean up examples

parent 4b10bf61
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -717,7 +717,7 @@ To match the desired subtree, the rule would be more precisely
written:
.LP
.nf
access to dn.regex="^(.+,)?dc=example,dc=com$$"
access to dn.regex="^(.+,)?dc=example,dc=com$"
by ...
.fi
.LP
......@@ -737,7 +737,7 @@ that matches the
clause, one could use
.LP
.nf
access to dn.regex="^(.+,)?uid=([^,]+),dc=example,dc=com$$"
access to dn.regex="^(.+,)?uid=([^,]+),dc=example,dc=com$"
by dn.regex="^uid=$1,dc=example,dc=com$$" write
by ...
.fi
......@@ -747,7 +747,7 @@ However, since all that is required in the
clause is substring expansion, a more efficient solution is
.LP
.nf
access to dn.regex="^(.+,)?uid=([^,]+),dc=example,dc=com$$"
access to dn.regex="^(.+,)?uid=([^,]+),dc=example,dc=com$"
by dn.exact,expand="uid=$1,dc=example,dc=com" write
by ...
.fi
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment